Showing posts with label Great. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Great. Show all posts

Thursday, 27 October 2011

South Sudan's Crucial Artery: The Great, Slow Road of Juba

A construction-company security guard walks by a new bridge on South Sudan's Juba-Nimule road on Jan. 24, 2011

Alan Boswell / MCT / Getty Images

If you've never thought much about pavement, take a drive from Juba to Nimule. Parts of South Sudan's busiest road have been paved, but the unfinished parts are still teeth-rattling stretches of pitted, rust-colored dirt. On a dry day, each passing truck leaves a impenetrable dust cloud in its wake; after a rain, pocks in the earth degenerate into red lagoons. The trucks whose tires don't sink into the mud veer wildly to dodge the lakes, sending lesser vehicles scattering. When you finally bounce back onto the pavement, it is so mercifully uneventful that you swear you will never take it for granted again, and before you can make any more promises you won't keep — cathunk! You're back on the dirt, splayed across the backseat like a starfish, bracing against windows and seats with all available limbs.

When it's done, the Juba-Nimule road will be the longest paved road — and by far the biggest infrastructure project — in the Republic of South Sudan, the world's youngest nation. USAID, a major donor to the three-month-old country, is paying for and overseeing the work on the 119-mile (192 km) route and the eight bridges along the way. Work began in 2008, and its total price tag of $220 million is $61 million over original projections. Some have questioned why only a third of the road is finished after three years; others wonder whether those millions of dollars were best spent so near the capital, instead of a more isolated area. (See photos on South Sudan's quest for independence.)

Few, however, would argue that the job shouldn't get done. In a country the size of France, there are less than 68 miles (110 km) of paved roads. Most of the nation's limited road network comprises dirt routes in various stages of disrepair. Money for infrastructure did not flow generously to the south from Khartoum, a chronic neglect that was one of many factors fueling the nation's decades of civil war. "Even before the ravages of war could set in, our country never had anything worth rebuilding," President Salva Kiir Mayardit said before the U.N. last month. Now that he and his ministers are in charge, they face the enormous task of creating a road system nearly from scratch. In August, local media reported that the government aims to pave over 4,300 miles (7,000 km) of roads — a feat they estimate could cost nearly $7 billion.

It's hard to imagine a weeks-old administration — for which everything is a priority — tackling that so soon. The logistics of building a road in a war-torn nation are daunting. Land mines plague many parts of the countryside and have to be cleared before grading can begin. Because South Sudan is landlocked, almost everything — from skilled engineers to bulldozers — has to be imported over land, a process that itself can get slowed down when, say, pirates off the coast of Africa hold up shipments. With the widespread prevalence of illegal guns, security has to be provided for road crews. On the Juba-Nimule road, USAID expects to spend $10 million alone on security and $8 million de-mining the road. Workers are still finding mines as the job continues. (See photos of South Sudan at the polls.)

Still, the young government needs to aim high. Without better roads, it won't be able to tackle some of its biggest problems. Despite its ample fertile land, South Sudan has extremely little commercial agriculture, in large part because there is, in most cases, no way to get farmers' produce to market. The nation has one of the highest rates of maternal mortality in the world; more roads would enable more women to get to hospitals before, during or after a complicated childbirth. They could also help rein in the violence that regularly erupts in remote areas of the country. When fighting breaks out between tribes, as it did this August when over 600 people were killed in Jonglei state, troops can't always get to the site of conflict to diffuse the situation. "You put a road in place and it opens up a lot of things," says Kevin Mullally, mission director for USAID in South Sudan. "It opens opportunities ... but if it's not well thought out, it could also destroy certain opportunities."

Near the end of the Juba-Nimule road, a breeze blows through a long, narrow surgical ward where patients try to nap through the afternoon heat. There, the staff is already seeing the good and the bad that modern roads will deliver. David Nyuma, the medical director at Nimule Hospital, scrolls through photos on his phone, landing on an image of the hospital morgue piled with contorted bodies. On June 17, two buses collided on the highway, killing 28 people. The twisted heaps of metal still sit on the side of the road; the first several rows of seats are gone. (Read about the conflict in Sudan.)

Since the road has been improved, many patients in the area have been able to hitch a ride with passing trucks to the hospital, a government facility funded by the British NGO Merlin. (That's helpful because the government-issued ambulance can't withstand the bumpy local roads and has never been used.) But the number of injuries Nyuma and his colleagues see from traffic accidents has risen dramatically. The problem, he says, is that most South Sudanese have no training in how to obey traffic laws, or how to enforce them. He says many of the motorcycle-taxi drivers who come in after collisions don't have licenses — a hazard on the streets of any village, but a potential catastrophe on a busy trade route packed with buses and trucks carrying goods from Uganda. "The traffic police are not well trained," Nyuma says. "Human beings need to be kept in check with laws. If they are free, they don't care for their lives."

Like so much else there, traffic safety too is scrambling to catch up. Last month 17 members of the nation's first motorcycle highway patrol graduated from training, but the government is still working out how to pay for the gas to send the unit out onto the road. The Ministry of Roads recently assured the government that a new road-safety bill is nearly ready. USAID has been helping fill the gap in the meantime, holding road-safety workshops for bus and truck drivers and in primary schools along the new road, where kids are learning things like to look both ways before crossing. At a busy intersection just outside the capital, a large billboard on the side of the Juba-Nimule road reminds pedestrians to use the nation's first zebra crossing. The stripes haven't been painted yet — they're coming. When they do, it may take some time for people to use them. But it will be a lot longer before anyone takes them — or the road they're painted on — for granted.

Produced in association with the International Reporting Project.

See photos of South Sudan on the eve of independence.

See a hidden tour of Juba, the world's newest capital.

Friday, 21 October 2011

Primary Politics: The Great GOP Nevada Pander

The Grand Nevada Pander | Swampland | TIME.com /* */ Home TIME Magazine Photos Videos Specials Topics Subscribe Mobile AppsNewslettersRSS @TIME NewsFeed U.S. Politics World Business Money Tech Health Science Entertainment Opinion SEARCH TIME.COM Full Archive Covers Videos 2012 ElectionDebatesDemocratic PartyPollsRepublican PartyMichele BachmannMitt RomneyRick PerryWhite HouseBarack ObamaJoe BidenCongressBudgetsHouseSenateLobbyingJohn BoehnerMitch McConnellNancy PelosiHarry ReidDomestic PolicyAbortionAgricultureDebtEconomyEducationHealth CareHousingForeign PolicyAfghanistanChinaDiplomacyHillary ClintonIranIraqPhotosSpecialsVideos PrimariesThe Grand Nevada PanderBy Alex Altman | @aaltman82 | October 14, 2011 | View CommentsTweetRobert Laberge / Getty ImagesRobert Laberge / Getty ImagesLights illuminate Las Vegas Boulevard on Oct. 13, 2011 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Four second-tier Republican presidential hopefuls — Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, Jon Huntsman and Rick Santorum — are threatening to bypass the Nevada caucuses if they take place Jan. 14, as presently planned. This is not, as you might surmise, because they’re sticklers for following RNC guidelines (which the Silver State skirted by bumping up its date in response to similar maneuvers by Florida and South Carolina) or deeply invested in preserving the sanctity of the GOP’s primary calendar. It’s a simple pander.

None of the four candidates are real contenders in Nevada, where Mitt Romney coasted four years ago and is favored to repeat. Each wants to showcase their fealty to the voters and kingmakers of New Hampshire, whose critical first-in-the-nation primary could choke off their presidential aspirations.

This is particularly true of Huntsman, the first to make noise about a Nevada boycott. The former Utah governor doubled down on his call Friday morning by bowing out of next week’s GOP debate in Las Vegas. Huntsman called the move “an effort to preserve New Hampshire’s historic first-in-the-nation primary status.” But that status isn’t in doubt. New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner, who has the power to set the date of the primary, has said it will take place sometime in December or early January. The only question is whether New Hampshire will have the same week-long buffer before the next contest that it has enjoyed in the past. “Your primary is critically important,” Huntsman told a New Hampshire Rotary Club on Thursday. That is doubly true for the candidate, who has staked his presidential hopes on a strong showing in the state and therefore has every reason to kowtow to its residents.

The calculus isn’t much more complicated for the likes of Bachmann and Santorum, who have made Iowa the centerpiece of their primary calendars. If public displays of solidarity with New Hampshire tradition can boost their lowly poll numbers, great. If not, a mass boycott partially illegitimizes Nevada, allowing them to skip the state and zip straight to South Carolina, where their brand on conservatism will find greater favor with the state’s legions of Evangelical voters. Gingrich, meanwhile, has been gaining ground in the Granite State and may opt to concentrate his campaign’s early-state resources there if the trend continues.

And what of the candidates who are resisting the boycott cry? Romney is the Nevada frontrunner. Rick Perry has the resources to compete and received a key early endorsement from Nevada’s Republican governor, Brian Sandoval. Ron Paul plans to make a play for the state, whose libertarian bent matches his own. “Dr. Paul is in this to win, and our campaign will compete for delegates everywhere we think we can win them,” said Jesse Benton, Paul’s campaign chairman. And the never-conventional Herman Cain has adopted an inscrutable early state-strategy that today took his surging campaign to Tennessee, of all places. (Update: According to New Hampshire’s WMUR, Cain’s camp said Friday afternoon that he will join the boycott.)

It takes courage to boycott a state you might win. This is naked self-interest.

Updated, 4:10 PM

Related Topics: Bill Gardner, boycott, caucuses, herman cain, iowa, jon huntsman, Michele Bachmann, mitt romney, Nevada, newt gingrich, rick perry, rick santorum, ron paul, Primaries
emailprintshareLinkedInStumbleUponRedditDiggMixxDel.i.ciousWriteView Comments@TIMEPoliticsLatest on SwamplandMitt Romney | October 14, 2011Lessons of ’08: Romney’s Rivals Could Collude

As my colleague Michael Crowley notes, the anti-Mitt Romney vote is still a lot bigger than the pro-Romney vote. I agree with Michael that Romney doesn’t have this thing as sewn up as the inside the Beltway pundits are saying. That said, he’s smartly playing his rivals off of one another to ensure that that anti-Romney vote is never consolidated.

Looking back at the 2007/08 campaign, Romney in many ways was the man to beat. He won the Ames Straw poll, he spent tens of millions of dollars of his own money, he was the first candidate up with TV ads and by January 2, 2008, he was the front-runner in most polls. So, how did he lose the nomination? The rest of the field ganged up on him.

From our PartnersJimmy Carter: 'I'm Optimistic' Obama Will Win 2012Huffington PostFive Questions for President ObamaPoliticoMichele Bachmann: Rick Perry Rewarded Donors With State MoneyHuffington PostMust Reads | October 14, 2011Morning Must Reads: BurdenBoehner orders up infrastructure, aviation and trade bills. Het gets prickly with Obama on jobs.The White House weighs a plan to woo private firms into a bigger role in housing finance.Romney continues Sino saber-rattling on trade.previousPerry’s Yellblog comments powered by Disqus The Page Updated 16 mins agoPaul Plan to Abolish Five Cabinet Secretary PositionsObama Taps Celebrity Pool for DonationsHuntsman Nearly Out of MoneyObama Admin. to Drop Insurance Program from Healthcare OverhaulCain Joins Nevada Boycott More on TIME.comiPhone 4S FrenzyiPhone 4S FrenzyBefore Wall Street: America's Top 10 Protest MovementsBefore Wall Street: America's Top 10 Protest MovementsWall Street: Photos from the ProtestsWall Street: Photos from the ProtestsFull ListMost PopularTIME.COMSwamplandCan Education Be 'Moneyball'-ed?Scientists Discover a Diamond as Big as a PlanetObamas Iran Dilemma: How to Respond to a Plot Seemingly Designed to Provoke Escalation?The Supreme Court: When Double Jeopardy Isn't Double JeopardyDilma Vs. Gisele: The War Over Brazilian Womanhood'The World Is Watching': Occupy Wall Street Stares Down the NYPD'The Whole World Is Watching': Occupy Wall Street Stares Down the NYPDWhat If the China Bubble Bursts?How the Pill Affects Sexual Satisfaction, Lasting MarriageWill the Washington Bomb Plot Force Obama Into War With Iran?Reality Check: The Cain Train Is Going to WreckWill Evangelicals Doom Romney?Inside the Numbers: Why Romney Outperforms Perry Against ObamaWhy Occupy Wall Street Is More Popular than the Tea Party*TIME Poll: Obama Leads Head-to-Head Matchups with Republican RivalsAnita Perry Gets Candid, Claims Christian VictimhoodThe Conservative Problem with 9-9-9Morning Must Reads: BurdenWhat You Missed at the GOP’s Dartmouth Debate: Used Milk and the Texas TurtleObama’s Tax Plan: ‘Fair Share’ vs. ‘Class Warfare’ VideosMore Videos Powered by WordPress.com VIP Stay Connected with TIME.comSubscribe to
RSS FeedsSign Up for
NewslettersGet the TIME
Magazine iPad EditionRead TIME Mobile
on your PhoneBecome a
Fan of TIMEGet TIME
Twitter Updates NewsFeed U.S. Politics World Business Money Health Science Entertainment Photos Videos Specials Magazine © 2011 Time Inc. All rights reservedPrivacy PolicyRSSNewsletterMobileTIME For KidsLIFE.com SubscribeContact UsTerms of UseMedia KitReprints & PermissionsHelpSite MapAd Choices TIME Our partners CNN CNN MONEY LIFE