Warner's latest book is We've Got Issues: Children and Parents in the Age of Medication.
A writer-mother of three in Brooklyn with a “tenuous and unpredictable income” tells of keeping her family afloat by growing her own fruits and veggies. Meanwhile, a Sesame Street effort on hunger in America plays up DIY solutions like food drives, new-and-improved parenting techniques, better grocery choices and community gardening.
(MORE: Top 10 Topical Sesame Street Characters)
All this proved a bit too much for Joel Berg, executive director of the New York City Coalition Against Hunger, who was moved to make an impassioned plea this week for a cultural reality check, warning about the possibility of the incursion of “a right-wing political agenda” into seemingly apolitical discussions of how best to fight the effects of a devastating economy on the nation’s most vulnerable.
Berg’s critique, which he focused, online, on Sesame Street, then widened, with me, on the phone this week, might, on the surface seem surprising: a kale and burdock root-munching Brooklyn mom would appear, at first glance, to have little in common with a Tea Party stalwart, and Sesame Street is hardly a hotbed of political reaction.
Yet in these, and in much of the well-meaning progressive response to the twin problems of hunger and obesity in our country, there is, indeed, a common thread: a deep-rooted, unthinking do-it-yourself individualism. It’s so ingrained as to be virtually unconscious. And at a time when nearly 49 million Americans are living in “food-insecure households” — i.e. homes where family members sometimes go hungry — it’s a tendency that, if unchecked, can do a great deal of harm.
(MORE: The World’s Growing Food-Price Crisis)
Berg, a former USDA Coordinator of Community Food Security, has spent the past two decades fighting hunger. In recent years, he has focused his efforts on working to enhance the poorest New Yorkers’ access to food. He’s a great fan of farmer’s markets (particularly when they make it possible for shoppers to pay for their purchases with food stamps), supports community gardens, and runs a number of CSAs — community supported agriculture programs — which specifically aim to bring fresh, local produce to low-income communities. But, he says, these small, local, well-meaning, if trendy efforts, however important and beneficial, can’t come close to accomplishing the large-scale good of a government program like the unsexy, old standby, food stamps (now called Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP benefits.)
“In both media and society there is trendiness and there’s what’s hot,” he complains. “Now it’s all about rebellion against The Man — corporate agribusiness.” (Which, some progressives say, profits directly the more that food stamp-style benefits expand.) “But we couldn’t solve this if people took to growing their own food. Even if we had community gardens on every corner, it would be dwarfed by food stamps.” The progressive impulse, he says, now centers around “the feeling that you’re somehow an outsider — so spending $60 for a free-range, grass-fed beef is being virtuous. But we need large scale guaranteed programs that impact tens of millions of people at once.”
Berg’s critique is echoed by a number of other experts who spend their lives trying to bring better food to America’s neediest tables. And it should serve as a sobering self-check for those of us easily enchanted with the vision of a foodie utopia where a rainbow coalition of backyard farmers will solve the nation’s food ills by growing charmingly mottled heirloom tomatoes.
Sometimes thinking small and local — without an eye to the systemic and political — paves the way toward rollbacks of progressive policies that really work. Sometimes “The Man” can do a great deal of good, for example,when funding programs that add incentive dollars to SNAP benefits at farmers markets. Fact is: as a society, we’ve been assiduously cultivating our own gardens for the past thirty years. And what our politics have brought us is a bumper crop of poorly nourished people.
Warner, a former contributing columnist for the New York Times, is the author, most recently, of We've Got Issues: Children and Parents in the Age of MedicationRead other related stories about this:Hunger Affects Costs All in U.S. $542 EachUPIMeet Lily, a Muppet Facing Growing Concern: National HungerCNNRelated Topics: locavores, New York City Coalition Against Hunger, nutrition, sesame street, Life & Style, SocietyemailprintshareLinkedInStumbleUponRedditDiggMixxDel.i.ciousWriteView Comments@TIMEIdeasLatest on TIME IdeasMovies | October 14, 2011In Defense of Movie Remakes
Those familiar titles you’re seeing on theater marquees are a sign of good stories, not creative bankruptcy
From our PartnersHerman Cain Brings Down New Hampshire HouseHoward Fineman, HuffPoWho Will Pay Price for Fast and Furious? Ruben Navarrette Jr., CNNThe Shameful Bias Against MormonsKathleen Parker, Washington PostKeeping Score | October 14, 2011God and the NFL: What Tim Tebow’s Celebrity Says About AmericaThe devout Christian quarterback for the Denver Broncos has acquired outsize celebrity. Why he symbolizes our divided times
previousIn Defense of Movie Remakes Letters to the EditorOctober 14, 2011Childbirth DebateThe president of Lamaze International takes issue with a TIME Ideas piece about the myths of natural childbirthOctober 12, 2011American ProtestationsWhat does "antiglobalization" mean?October 10, 2011The Harassed Can Have HopeIn the face of death threats, a Boston transsexual encourages bullied teensSend us your letters | View more lettersMore on TIME.comPhotos: Occupy Wall StreetChicago Ideas Week 2011: Intelligence SquaredWhat You Need to Know About BullyingFull ListMost PopularTIME.COMIdeasCan Education Be 'Moneyball'-ed?Scientists Discover a Diamond as Big as a PlanetObamas Iran Dilemma: How to Respond to a Plot Seemingly Designed to Provoke Escalation?The Supreme Court: When Double Jeopardy Isn't Double JeopardyDilma Vs. Gisele: The War Over Brazilian Womanhood'The World Is Watching': Occupy Wall Street Stares Down the NYPD'The Whole World Is Watching': Occupy Wall Street Stares Down the NYPDWhat If the China Bubble Bursts?How the Pill Affects Sexual Satisfaction, Lasting MarriageWill the Washington Bomb Plot Force Obama Into War With Iran?Can Education Be ‘Moneyball’-ed?God and the NFL: What Tim Tebow’s Celebrity Says About AmericaThe Myths of “Natural” ChildbirthDon’t Denigrate The PotatoCan Whites Say The N-Word?The Locavore’s IllusionsShow Them The MoneyFrom the Arab Spring to the American Fall?Bill Clinton Reminisces About Steve JobsThe Stories I Carry With MeHistoric TIME LettersApril 26, 1963Blame the Hollywood GremlinsHollywood designer Edith Head defends her recordMay 26, 1958She Was FramedFred Astaire doesn't mince wordsJuly 21, 1967Source of EmbarrassmentGovernor Reagan wants an explanation Powered by WordPress.com VIP Stay Connected with TIME.comSubscribe toRSS FeedsSign Up for
NewslettersGet the TIME
Magazine iPad EditionRead TIME Mobile
on your PhoneBecome a
Fan of TIMEGet TIME
Twitter Updates NewsFeed U.S. Politics World Business Money Health Science Entertainment Photos Videos Specials Magazine © 2011 Time Inc. All rights reservedPrivacy PolicyRSSNewsletterMobileTIME For KidsLIFE.com SubscribeContact UsTerms of UseMedia KitReprints & PermissionsHelpSite MapAd Choices TIME Our partners CNN CNN MONEY LIFE
No comments:
Post a Comment