Space Junk Keeps Falling to Earth

Space Junk Keeps Falling to Earth - TIME window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({ appId: "53177223193", cookie: true, // these two are not required for partners that status: true, // only rely on stk plugins and don't use connect xfbml: true });};(function() { var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true; e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js'; document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);}()); Home TIME Magazine Photos Videos Specials Topics Subscribe Mobile AppsNewslettersRSS @TIME NewsFeed U.S. Politics World Business Money Tech Health Science Entertainment SEARCH TIME.COM Full Archive Covers Videos Main Medicine Diet & Fitness Love & Family Mental Health Policy & Industry Space Space Junk Keeps Fallin' on My Head By Jeffrey Kluger Monday, Oct. 10, 2011 An artist impression of the ROSAT satellite in space.

German Aerospce Center Comment Print EmailReprints share LinkedInStumbleUponRedditDigg Del.i.cious Tweet

If you knew what was going on above your head, you probably wouldn't sleep at night. It was 54 years ago this week that the first satellite ? Russia's little Sputnik ? went into orbit, and in the half-century since, we've made travel to near-earth space largely routine. That, by almost any measure, is a good thing, but like so many good things human beings build or do or achieve, a very bad thing comes along with it: junk.

For every spacecraft that goes into orbit, all kinds of rubbish ? bolts, boosters, adapter rings, insulation, even paint chips ? are also released. Five decades of that kind of littering has created a very big mess: according to tallies from NASA, NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command), the Federal Communications Commission and other domestic and international agencies, there are currently 17,000 objects measuring 4 in. (10 cm) or greater circling the earth. There are a whopping 200,000 in the 1-in. to 3-in. (2.5 cm to 7.5 cm) range, and millions smaller than an inch. (See pictures of the earth from space.)

Many of those objects in the largest category are much, much larger than a mere 4 in. (10 cm). Indeed, they are entire spacecraft themselves. Aged satellites ? some the size of a school bus and weighing on the order of tons ? that have outlived their usefulness often wind up simply drifting through space like an abandoned barge. In late September, a 6-ton NASA research satellite, launched in 1991, came plummeting home, falling safely into the south Pacific, but not before causing a lot of scientists a lot of jitters as they watched the roulette wheel of the satellite's orbit, trying to calculate just when and where the ship would lose enough energy to drop from the sky. No sooner had that scare ended than the German space agency announced that a 2.5-ton space telescope called ROSAT would be tumbling home sometime in late October or early November ? landing spot still unknown. In August, problems with Russia's Soyuz booster, which is the only space taxi American astronauts currently have, triggered a lot of talk about whether the International Space Station (ISS) would have to be abandoned, causing the entire 357-ft. (109 m) facility to plunge back to earth.

The ISS is not going anywhere soon, thanks to onboard boosters that can stabilize and raise its orbit, but the rest of the junk will ultimately go down, if it doesn't collide with another spacecraft first ? a whole other category of possible calamity. Just such a cosmic crack-up occurred in 2009 between decommissioned American and Russian satellites, an accident that would have been instantly fatal if one or both of the vehicles had been inhabited.(Read about whether NASA will have to abandon the International Space Station.)

The very enormity of the debris belt would seem to make many more such accidents inevitable, but as TIME reported after the 2009 collision, the risk is minimized by the fact that all objects orbiting at the same altitude also move at the same speed ? 17,500 m.p.h. (28,200 km/h). That means they're essentially standing still relative to one another. To close the gap between two objects, as, say, a Soyuz spacecraft does when approaching the ISS, it's necessary to change that relative speed ? in this case, by the Soyuz tweaking its thrusters to accelerate ever so slightly. Relative to the station, it's moving at a very safe crawl, just enough to nose into a docking port.

See a photo history of the U.S. space-shuttle program.

1 2 NEXT PAGE » Comment Print EmailReprints share LinkedInStumbleUponRedditDigg Del.i.cious Most Popular »Full List » MOST READ MOST EMAILED In Some Chinese Hospitals, Violence Is Out of Control and It's Doctors Who Are At RiskScientists '95% Sure' Bigfoot Lives in Russian TundraNew Proof That Comets Watered the EarthWhy You Should Worry About China's Real Estate Bubble BurstingSteve Jobs, 1955?2011: Mourning Technology's Great ReinventorTeacher, Leave Those Kids Alone: A Look at South Korea's Education SystemBirth and Death: Afghanistan's Struggles with Maternal MortalityThe Honeymoon's Over: Sicily Cracks Down on Weddings ReceiptsSteve Jobs: Remembering the Dissatisfied ManRomney in Debate: I Can Work with 'Good' Democrats Teacher, Leave Those Kids Alone: A Look at South Korea's Education SystemScientists '95% Sure' Bigfoot Lives in Russian TundraMedicine: New Labels for FoodA Food Of One's OwnWhat You Need to Know About ... Nuts, Beans & OilsWhy You Should Worry About China's Real Estate Bubble BurstingComing Together to Kill Education ReformLifelong Effects of Childhood ObesityMeet Fred Davis: The GOP's Hottest Mad ManShanghai: 10 Things to Do More News from Our Partners CNN OCD in young kids: A 'darkness' Study: Some supplements may pose risks for older women Police arrest CDC official for child molestation, bestiality Health.com Can a Healthy Diet Help Psoriasis? 20 Celebs Who Battled Depression How to Help Someone in Pain Time.com on Digg Upcoming Popular Today POWERED BY digg

Related PhotosA Photo History of the Shuttle Program StoriesWill NASA Be Forced to Abandon the International Space Station? Satellite Falling to Earth: NASA Scientist Puts It into Perspective Newsfeed Amy Winehouse's Father Will Write Memoir, Donate Proceeds to Charity NBA Lockout: First Two Weeks of the Season Gone. Now What? Japan to Give Away 10,000 Free Flights to Tourists in 2012 More on TIME.com Chicago Ideas Week 2011: Intelligence Squared Top 10 Nobel Prize Controversies Top 10 Topical Sesame Street Characters Techland New Version of iTunes Available, iOS 5 Update Coming Tomorrow U.K. ISPs Deny Automatic 'Parental Control' Rumors Adobe Shows Off Blurry Picture Fix in Photoshop Moneyland “Volcker Rule” Officially Proposed, Forbidding Banks From Trading For Profit — And Angering Them Latest Housing Bust Casualty: Babies ING Direct Account Openings Skyrocket After BofA, Citi Fee Hikes Top Stories on TIME.com In Some Chinese Hospitals, Violence Is Out of Control and It's Doctors Who Are At Risk The Israel-Hamas Prisoner Swap: Who Wins in the Freeing of Gilad Shalit? Iran's Alleged Assassination Plot: Surveying the Political Fallout Quotes of the Day » "They"ve got to win two more. We"ve got to win four. It"s pretty simple math." JIM LEYLAND, manager of the Detroit Tigers, on his team’s challenge to come back after being down two games to zero in the American League Championships as the series moved to Detroit; the Tigers won the third game 5-2 More Quotes » For use in rail of Articles page or Section Fronts pages. Duplicate and change name as necesssary to distinguish. Stay Connected with TIME.comSubscribe to
RSS FeedsSign Up for
NewslettersGet the TIME
Magazine iPad EditionRead TIME Mobile
on your PhoneBecome a
Fan of TIMEGet TIME
Twitter Updates NewsFeed U.S. Politics World Business Money Health Science Entertainment Photos Videos Specials Magazine © 2011 Time Inc. All rights reservedPrivacy PolicyRSSNewsletterMobileTIME For KidsLIFE.com SubscribeContact UsTerms of UseMedia KitReprints & PermissionsHelpSite MapAd Choices TIME Our partners CNN CNN MONEY LIFE